
Suunto
Better than Polar H9 at:
- A higher overall score (85 vs 80)


Polar H9
€64.90
The better pick if you want:
Wahoo TICKR FIT
kr 799
The better pick if you want:
No clear advantage on the specs we track.
Each axis ranks against the 14 products in Heart Rate Monitor on the site: the further out, the more it stands out in that spec (lighter, cheaper…).
Center: lowest in the category · Edge: highest
Polar H9· leads in 4
Wahoo TICKR FIT· leads in 1
Battery life
Features
Range
Water resistance
Lightness
Affordability
A spec without data for a product is left out of its shape, so it doesn't count as a low score.
Compare features between Polar H9 vs Wahoo TICKR FIT

Help the community by answering

Help the community by answering
Watch real-world YouTube reviews from content creators and the Trail Running community.
See the differences between Polar H9 and Wahoo TICKR FIT in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Answers based on product data and key differences.
Can't find what you're looking for? Ask anything about Polar H9 vs Wahoo TICKR FIT and our AI will answer.
For value comparison: The Polar H9 ($64.9) offers better affordability compared to the Wahoo TICKR FIT ($79.99). Consider your budget and the specific features that matter most for your trail running setup.
The Polar H9 is newer: it came out in January 2020, and the Wahoo TICKR FIT in 2018.
Closest in price, with what each one does better.

Suunto
Better than Polar H9 at: