Asics Blazeblast vs Craft Pure Trail X

Asics Blazeblast

Asics Blazeblast

€159.95
Craft Pure Trail X

Craft Pure Trail X

$159.95

Quick verdict

Asics Blazeblast

€159.95

The better pick if you want:

  • A higher overall score (86 vs 71)
  • More video reviews to check (5 vs 1)
  • A lighter option (84 g less)
  • More cushioning (43 vs 36 mm heel stack)

Craft Pure Trail X

$159.95

The better pick if you want:

  • A lower drop (6 vs 8 mm)

Spec profile

Each axis ranks against the 173 products in Shoes on the site: the further out, the more it stands out in that spec (lighter, cheaper…).

Center: lowest in the category · Edge: highest

Asics Blazeblast· leads in 2

CushioningLightness

Craft Pure Trail X· leads in 1

Affordability
  • Cushioning

    43 mmTop 3%
    36 mmTop 35%
  • Lightness

    252 gTop 12%
    336 g
  • Grip

    2.5 mm
    No data
  • Drophigher isn't better or worse

    8 mm
    6 mm
  • Affordability

    $160
    $160Top 48%

A spec without data for a product is left out of its shape, so it doesn't count as a low score.

Technical Specifications

Compare features between Asics Blazeblast vs Craft Pure Trail X

Best value in this comparison

Essentials

€159.95
$159.95
August 2026
June 2025
252 g
336 g

Overview

Road-to-Trail Running Shoe
Trail Running Shoe
Road, gravel paths and light trails
wet, muddy and rocky trails
Mixed road and trail runs, gravel and park trails
Long-distance trail running and trail races

Cushioning

8 mm
6 mm
43 mm
36 mm
35 mm
30 mm
FF BLAST MAX foam with a forefoot trampoline pod for energetic toe-offs
Cr Foam™ ultra-light, high-rebound supercritical foam
High, soft and bouncy cushioning
Cushioned and durable for long distances

Grip & protection

Hybrid ASICSGRIP rubber with 2.5 mm lugs for road and trail
Full-traction lugged rubber outsole
—
Exposed rock plate under the midfoot and forefoot
—
Lugged rubber for mud and rock

Upper & fit

—
Ripstop upper reinforced with TPU in high-wear areas
—
Removable sockliner
—
Roomy upper with a secure, comfortable fit
Ready to buy?

On the terrain

How Asics Blazeblast vs Craft Pure Trail X should behave on each kind of ground, estimated from lug depth, stack height, weight and outsole rubber. Pick a ground to see what decides it.

Pick a groundAverage
Asics Blazeblast46
Craft Pure Trail X48

FlatPacked, runnable trail

Cushioning and low weight make the kilometres easier; very deep lugs squirm on hard ground.

Asics Blazeblast91
  • Cushioning40/40
  • Lightness26/35
  • Smooth roll25/25
Craft Pure Trail X62
  • Cushioning33/40
  • Lightness4/35
  • Smooth roll25/25

Estimated: no data on lug depth, assumed average.

A model built from the specs to compare shoes, not a lab measurement.

Asics Blazeblast

Have you used the Asics Blazeblast before?

Help the community by answering

Craft Pure Trail X

Have you used the Craft Pure Trail X before?

Help the community by answering

Video Reviews

Watch real-world YouTube reviews from content creators and the Trail Running community.

See all 6 video reviews

Asics Blazeblast

Craft Pure Trail X

Visual Comparison

See the differences between Asics Blazeblast and Craft Pure Trail X in a side-by-side slider comparison.

Asics Blazeblast
Craft Pure Trail X

Comparison Questions

Answers based on product data and key differences.

Ask your own question

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask anything about Asics Blazeblast vs Craft Pure Trail X and our AI will answer.

Enter to send · Shift+Enter for a new line
Try asking:

Frequently Asked Questions

Which offers better value: Asics Blazeblast vs Craft Pure Trail X?

For value comparison: The Asics Blazeblast ($160) provides premium features compared to the Craft Pure Trail X ($159.95). Consider your budget and the specific features that matter most for your trail running setup.

Which is newer, the Asics Blazeblast or the Craft Pure Trail X?

The Asics Blazeblast is newer: it came out in August 2026, and the Craft Pure Trail X in June 2025.

Looking for alternatives to Asics Blazeblast?

Closest in price, with what each one does better.

See all alternatives