COOSPO H9Z vs Wahoo TICKR FIT

COOSPO H9Z

$38

Wahoo TICKR FIT

kr 799

Quick verdict

COOSPO H9Z

$38

The better pick if you want:

A higher overall score (64 vs 50)
To spend $41.99 less

Wahoo TICKR FIT

kr 799

The better pick if you want:

No clear advantage on the specs we track.

Spec profile

Each axis ranks against the 14 products in Heart Rate Monitor on the site: the further out, the more it stands out in that spec (lighter, cheaper…).

Center: lowest in the category · Edge: highest

COOSPO H9Z· leads in 4

Battery lifeFeaturesLightnessAffordability

Wahoo TICKR FIT· leads in none

Tied

Water resistance

Battery life
50 h
30 h
Features
3Top 46%
1
Range
10 m
No data
Water resistance
1 m
1 m
Lightness
45 gTop 46%
46 g
Affordability
$38Top 11%
$80Top 39%

A spec without data for a product is left out of its shape, so it doesn't count as a low score.

Technical Specifications

Compare features between COOSPO H9Z vs Wahoo TICKR FIT

Best value in this comparisonOnly differences (14)

Essentials

$38

kr 799

—

2018

Overview

Electrical (ECG-based chest strap)

Optical (PPG - photoplethysmography)

ECG heart rate sensor

Optical heart rate sensor

High-accuracy ECG-based heart rate tracking, More precise data compared to optical sensors, Dual Bluetooth and ANT+ connectivity, Supports simultaneous connection to multiple devices, Rechargeable battery, no coin cells to replace

Optical heart rate and calorie tracking from the forearm, Comfortable alternative to a chest strap, Bluetooth and ANT+ for phones, watches and bike computers, Rechargeable battery that lasts up to 30 hours, Two armband sizes included

Connectivity

Bluetooth Low Energy, ANT+

Yes

Up to 10 m (Bluetooth), extended with ANT+

—

Battery

Rechargeable (charging dock)

Rechargeable (magnetic charging dock)

Up to 50 hours (continuous use)

Up to 30 hours

Build & durability

IP67 (1 m immersion, not suitable for swimming)

IPX7 (1 m immersion, not suitable for swimming)

-10°C to 50°C

—

Approx. 45 g (sensor + strap)

Approx. 46 g (sensor + armband)

Elastic fabric with conductive electrodes

Adjustable fabric armband

ABS plastic

Plastic

Ready to buy?

Have you used the COOSPO H9Z before?

Help the community by answering

Have you used the Wahoo TICKR FIT before?

Help the community by answering

Video Reviews

Watch real-world YouTube reviews from content creators and the Trail Running community.

See all 10 video reviews

COOSPO H9Z

Wahoo TICKR FIT

Visual Comparison

See the differences between COOSPO H9Z and Wahoo TICKR FIT in a side-by-side slider comparison.

Comparison Questions

Answers based on product data and key differences.

Ask your own question

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask anything about COOSPO H9Z vs Wahoo TICKR FIT and our AI will answer.

Try asking:

Frequently Asked Questions

Which offers better value: COOSPO H9Z vs Wahoo TICKR FIT?

For value comparison: The COOSPO H9Z ($38) offers better affordability compared to the Wahoo TICKR FIT ($79.99). Consider your budget and the specific features that matter most for your trail running setup.