COOSPO HW9 vs Wahoo TICKR FIT

COOSPO HW9

$47

Wahoo TICKR FIT

kr 799

Quick verdict

COOSPO HW9

$47

The better pick if you want:

A higher overall score (68 vs 50)
To spend $32.99 less

Wahoo TICKR FIT

kr 799

The better pick if you want:

No clear advantage on the specs we track.

Spec profile

Each axis ranks against the 14 products in Heart Rate Monitor on the site: the further out, the more it stands out in that spec (lighter, cheaper…).

Center: lowest in the category · Edge: highest

COOSPO HW9· leads in 4

Battery lifeFeaturesLightnessAffordability

Wahoo TICKR FIT· leads in none

Tied

Water resistance

Battery life
35 h
30 h
Features
3Top 46%
1
Range
10 m
No data
Water resistance
1 m
1 m
Lightness
20 gTop 17%
46 g
Affordability
$47Top 18%
$80Top 39%

A spec without data for a product is left out of its shape, so it doesn't count as a low score.

Technical Specifications

Compare features between COOSPO HW9 vs Wahoo TICKR FIT

Best value in this comparisonOnly differences (13)

Essentials

$47

kr 799

2023

2018

Overview

Optical (PPG - photoplethysmography)

Optical heart rate sensor, Motion sensor (accelerometer)

Optical heart rate sensor

Accurate real-time heart rate tracking from arm position, Dual Bluetooth and ANT+ for broad device compatibility, Supports connection to multiple devices simultaneously, Lightweight and comfortable alternative to chest straps, Long battery life suitable for endurance training

Optical heart rate and calorie tracking from the forearm, Comfortable alternative to a chest strap, Bluetooth and ANT+ for phones, watches and bike computers, Rechargeable battery that lasts up to 30 hours, Two armband sizes included

Connectivity

Bluetooth Low Energy, ANT+

Yes

Up to 10 m (Bluetooth), extended with ANT+

—

Battery

Rechargeable (90 mAh, magnetic USB charger)

Rechargeable (magnetic charging dock)

Up to 35 hours (training mode)

Up to 30 hours

Build & durability

IP67 (1 m immersion, not suitable for swimming)

IPX7 (1 m immersion, not suitable for swimming)

-10°C to 50°C

—

20 g (sensor + strap)

Approx. 46 g (sensor + armband)

Elastic fabric armband

Adjustable fabric armband

ABS plastic

Plastic

Ready to buy?

Have you used the COOSPO HW9 before?

Help the community by answering

Have you used the Wahoo TICKR FIT before?

Help the community by answering

Video Reviews

Watch real-world YouTube reviews from content creators and the Trail Running community.

See all 10 video reviews

COOSPO HW9

Wahoo TICKR FIT

Visual Comparison

See the differences between COOSPO HW9 and Wahoo TICKR FIT in a side-by-side slider comparison.

Comparison Questions

Answers based on product data and key differences.

Ask your own question

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask anything about COOSPO HW9 vs Wahoo TICKR FIT and our AI will answer.

Try asking:

Frequently Asked Questions

Which offers better value: COOSPO HW9 vs Wahoo TICKR FIT?

For value comparison: The COOSPO HW9 ($47) offers better affordability compared to the Wahoo TICKR FIT ($79.99). Consider your budget and the specific features that matter most for your trail running setup.