
Compressport
Better than CamelBak Ultra Belt 17oz at:
- To spend $5 less
- A lighter option (15 g less)


CamelBak Ultra Belt 17oz
€50
The better pick if you want:
Nathan TrailMix Plus 3.0
€55
The better pick if you want:
No clear advantage on the specs we track.
Each axis ranks against the 12 products in Running Belt on the site: the further out, the more it stands out in that spec (lighter, cheaper…).
Center: lowest in the category · Edge: highest
CamelBak Ultra Belt 17oz· leads in 5
Nathan TrailMix Plus 3.0· leads in none
Capacity
Pockets
Lightness
Features
Affordability
Compare features between CamelBak Ultra Belt 17oz vs Nathan TrailMix Plus 3.0

Help the community by answering

Help the community by answering
Watch real-world YouTube reviews from content creators and the Trail Running community.
See the differences between CamelBak Ultra Belt 17oz and Nathan TrailMix Plus 3.0 in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Answers based on product data and key differences.
Can't find what you're looking for? Ask anything about CamelBak Ultra Belt 17oz vs Nathan TrailMix Plus 3.0 and our AI will answer.
For value comparison: The CamelBak Ultra Belt 17oz ($50) offers better affordability compared to the Nathan TrailMix Plus 3.0 ($54.99). Consider your budget and the specific features that matter most for your trail running setup.
Both came out in 2023.
Closest in price, with what each one does better.

Compressport
Better than CamelBak Ultra Belt 17oz at:

Naked
Better than CamelBak Ultra Belt 17oz at: