Asics Fujispeed 4 vs Saucony Peregrine 16 GTX

Asics Fujispeed 4

Asics Fujispeed 4

$180
Saucony Peregrine 16 GTX

Saucony Peregrine 16 GTX

$180

Quick verdict

Asics Fujispeed 4

$180

The better pick if you want:

  • A higher overall score (91 vs 71)
  • A lighter option (56 g less)
  • More cushioning (43 vs 32 mm heel stack)

Saucony Peregrine 16 GTX

$180

The better pick if you want:

  • Deeper lugs for grip (4 vs 3.5 mm)

Spec profile

Each axis ranks against the 173 products in Shoes on the site: the further out, the more it stands out in that spec (lighter, cheaper…).

Center: lowest in the category · Edge: highest

Asics Fujispeed 4· leads in 2

CushioningLightness

Saucony Peregrine 16 GTX· leads in 1

Grip

Tied

Affordability
  • Cushioning

    43 mmTop 3%
    32 mm
  • Lightness

    240 gTop 8%
    296 g
  • Grip

    3.5 mm
    4 mmTop 50%
  • Drophigher isn't better or worse

    5 mm
    4 mm
  • Affordability

    $180
    $180

Technical Specifications

Compare features between Asics Fujispeed 4 vs Saucony Peregrine 16 GTX

Best value in this comparison

Essentials

$180
$180
July 2025
2026
240 g
296 g

Overview

Trail Racing Shoe
Waterproof Trail Running Shoe
Technical mountain trails and trail races
wet, muddy and technical trails
Trail races and fast sessions on mountain terrain
Rainy, muddy and winter trail running

Cushioning

5 mm
4 mm
43 mm
32 mm
38 mm
28 mm
Dual layer of FF BLAST PLUS foam with a full-length carbon plate
PWRRUN foam with extra cushioning
Light, energetic and propulsive ride
Dry feet with cushioned daily-trainer comfort

Grip & protection

ASICSGRIP rubber with 3.5 mm lugs for grip on varied terrain
Full-coverage Vibram® Megagrip with 4 mm lugs
—
Rubber toe cap and reinforced high-abrasion zones
—
Vibram® Megagrip for wet and dry surfaces

Upper & fit

—
GORE-TEX Invisible Fit waterproof, breathable membrane with abrasion protection
—
PWRRUN+ insole
—
Traditional lace closure with snug trail fit
Ready to buy?

On the terrain

How Asics Fujispeed 4 vs Saucony Peregrine 16 GTX should behave on each kind of ground, estimated from lug depth, stack height, weight and outsole rubber. Pick a ground to see what decides it.

Pick a groundAverage
Asics Fujispeed 455
Saucony Peregrine 16 GTX56

FlatPacked, runnable trail

Cushioning and low weight make the kilometres easier; very deep lugs squirm on hard ground.

Asics Fujispeed 495
  • Cushioning40/40
  • Lightness30/35
  • Smooth roll25/25
Saucony Peregrine 16 GTX65
  • Cushioning25/40
  • Lightness15/35
  • Smooth roll25/25

A model built from the specs to compare shoes, not a lab measurement.

Asics Fujispeed 4

Have you used the Asics Fujispeed 4 before?

Help the community by answering

Saucony Peregrine 16 GTX

Have you used the Saucony Peregrine 16 GTX before?

Help the community by answering

Video Reviews

Watch real-world YouTube reviews from content creators and the Trail Running community.

See all 5 video reviews

Asics Fujispeed 4

Saucony Peregrine 16 GTX

No YouTube reviews available for this product yet.

Visual Comparison

See the differences between Asics Fujispeed 4 and Saucony Peregrine 16 GTX in a side-by-side slider comparison.

Asics Fujispeed 4
Saucony Peregrine 16 GTX

Comparison Questions

Answers based on product data and key differences.

Ask your own question

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask anything about Asics Fujispeed 4 vs Saucony Peregrine 16 GTX and our AI will answer.

Enter to send · Shift+Enter for a new line
Try asking:

Frequently Asked Questions

Which offers better value: Asics Fujispeed 4 vs Saucony Peregrine 16 GTX?

For value comparison: The Asics Fujispeed 4 ($180) provides premium features compared to the Saucony Peregrine 16 GTX ($180). Consider your budget and the specific features that matter most for your trail running setup.

Which is newer, the Asics Fujispeed 4 or the Saucony Peregrine 16 GTX?

The Saucony Peregrine 16 GTX is newer: it came out in 2026, and the Asics Fujispeed 4 in July 2025.

Looking for alternatives to Asics Fujispeed 4?

Closest in price, with what each one does better.

See all alternatives