Asics Trabuco 13

Joma Sierra 6
Quick verdict
Asics Trabuco 13
$119
The better pick if you want:
- A higher overall score (17 vs 7)
- More cushioning (34 vs 26 mm heel stack)
Joma Sierra 6
$78
The better pick if you want:
- To spend $41 less
- A lighter option (30 g less)
- A lower drop (6 vs 8 mm)
Spec profile
Each axis ranks against the 150 products in Shoes on the site: the further out, the more it stands out in that spec (lighter, cheaper…).
Center: lowest in the category · Edge: highest
Asics Trabuco 13· leads in 1
Joma Sierra 6· leads in 2
Cushioning
34 mmTop 47%26 mmLightness
320 g290 gGrip
4 mmTop 49%No dataDrophigher isn't better or worse
8 mm6 mmAffordability
$119Top 14%$78Top 3%
A spec without data for a product is left out of its shape, so it doesn't count as a low score.
Technical Specifications
Compare features between Asics Trabuco 13 vs Joma Sierra 6
Essentials
Overview
Cushioning
Grip & protection
Upper & fit
Have you used the Asics Trabuco 13 before?
Help the community by answering

Have you used the Joma Sierra 6 before?
Help the community by answering
Video Reviews
Watch real-world YouTube reviews from content creators and the Trail Running community.
Asics Trabuco 13
Joma Sierra 6
Visual Comparison
See the differences between Asics Trabuco 13 and Joma Sierra 6 in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Comparison Questions
Answers based on product data and key differences.
Ask your own question
Can't find what you're looking for? Ask anything about Asics Trabuco 13 vs Joma Sierra 6 and our AI will answer.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which offers better value: Asics Trabuco 13 vs Joma Sierra 6?
For value comparison: The Asics Trabuco 13 ($119) provides premium features compared to the Joma Sierra 6 ($78). Consider your budget and the specific features that matter most for your trail running setup.
Looking for alternatives to Asics Trabuco 13?
Closest in price, with what each one does better.

The North Face
Better than Asics Trabuco 13 at:
- A lower drop (6 vs 8 mm)

Joma
Better than Asics Trabuco 13 at:
- A lighter option (60 g less)
- More cushioning (38 vs 34 mm heel stack)










