Asics TRABUCO MAX 4 vs Hoka Torrent 5

Asics TRABUCO MAX 4

Asics TRABUCO MAX 4

$126
Hoka Torrent 5

Hoka Torrent 5

$129.95

Quick verdict

Asics TRABUCO MAX 4

$126

The better pick if you want:

  • To spend $4 less
  • More cushioning (41 vs 35 mm heel stack)

Hoka Torrent 5

$129.95

The better pick if you want:

  • A higher overall score (94 vs 85)
  • A lighter option (56 g less)
  • Deeper lugs for grip (5 vs 4.5 mm)

Spec profile

Each axis ranks against the 173 products in Shoes on the site: the further out, the more it stands out in that spec (lighter, cheaper…).

Center: lowest in the category · Edge: highest

Asics TRABUCO MAX 4· leads in 1

Cushioning

Hoka Torrent 5· leads in 2

LightnessGrip

Tied

Affordability
  • Cushioning

    41 mmTop 7%
    35 mmTop 43%
  • Lightness

    320 g
    264 gTop 20%
  • Grip

    4.5 mmTop 25%
    5 mmTop 13%
  • Drophigher isn't better or worse

    5 mm
    5 mm
  • Affordability

    $126Top 21%
    $130Top 22%

Technical Specifications

Compare features between Asics TRABUCO MAX 4 vs Hoka Torrent 5

Best value in this comparison

Essentials

$126
$129.95
2025
June 2026
320 g
264 g

Overview

Trail Running Shoe
Trail Running Shoe
rugged trails, gravel, forest paths
Mixed and rough trail terrain
—
Daily trail running, shorter races, rough and technical trails

Cushioning

5 mm
5 mm
41 mm
35 mm
36 mm
30 mm
GEL cushioning with FlyteFoam™ Propel technology
EVA foam with a lower-profile, ground-connected ride and no rock plate
Moderate cushioning with stability focus
Balanced cushioning with good ground feel

Grip & protection

AHAR™ rubber with aggressive lugs for traction
High-abrasion rubber with 5 mm multi-directional lugs
Reinforced toe cap and lateral support
Protective toe rand; the foam absorbs rock impacts
—
5 mm lugs for grip on loose, muddy and rocky trails

Upper & fit

Breathable engineered mesh with synthetic overlays
Engineered mesh with perforations for breathability and a protective rand
Removable cushioned sockliner
—
—
Gusseted tongue and padded heel collar for a secure midfoot
Ready to buy?

On the terrain

How Asics TRABUCO MAX 4 vs Hoka Torrent 5 should behave on each kind of ground, estimated from lug depth, stack height, weight and outsole rubber. Pick a ground to see what decides it.

Pick a groundAverage
Asics TRABUCO MAX 454
Hoka Torrent 565

FlatPacked, runnable trail

Cushioning and low weight make the kilometres easier; very deep lugs squirm on hard ground.

Asics TRABUCO MAX 469
  • Cushioning40/40
  • Lightness8/35
  • Smooth roll21/25
Hoka Torrent 571
  • Cushioning31/40
  • Lightness23/35
  • Smooth roll17/25

A model built from the specs to compare shoes, not a lab measurement.

Asics TRABUCO MAX 4

Have you used the Asics TRABUCO MAX 4 before?

Help the community by answering

Hoka Torrent 5

Have you used the Hoka Torrent 5 before?

Help the community by answering

Video Reviews

Watch real-world YouTube reviews from content creators and the Trail Running community.

See all 5 video reviews

Asics TRABUCO MAX 4

Hoka Torrent 5

No YouTube reviews available for this product yet.

Visual Comparison

See the differences between Asics TRABUCO MAX 4 and Hoka Torrent 5 in a side-by-side slider comparison.

Asics TRABUCO MAX 4
Hoka Torrent 5

Comparison Questions

Answers based on product data and key differences.

Ask your own question

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask anything about Asics TRABUCO MAX 4 vs Hoka Torrent 5 and our AI will answer.

Enter to send · Shift+Enter for a new line
Try asking:

Frequently Asked Questions

Which offers better value: Asics TRABUCO MAX 4 vs Hoka Torrent 5?

For value comparison: The Asics TRABUCO MAX 4 ($126) offers better affordability compared to the Hoka Torrent 5 ($130). Consider your budget and the specific features that matter most for your trail running setup.

Which is newer, the Asics TRABUCO MAX 4 or the Hoka Torrent 5?

The Hoka Torrent 5 is newer: it came out in June 2026, and the Asics TRABUCO MAX 4 in 2025.

Looking for alternatives to Asics TRABUCO MAX 4?

Closest in price, with what each one does better.

See all alternatives