Sign In

Brooks Divide 6 vs The North Face Altamesa 300

Brooks Divide 6

Brooks Divide 6

$110
The North Face Altamesa 300

The North Face Altamesa 300

$120

Why is The North Face Altamesa 300 better than Brooks Divide 6?

Technical Specifications

Compare features between Brooks Divide 6 vs The North Face Altamesa 300

Feature

Brooks Divide 6

The North Face Altamesa 300

110 $
120 $
BEST
285 g
N/A
Trail Running Shoe
Trail Running Shoe
road, gravel paths, light trail
Gravel paths and mountain trails
8 mm
BEST
6 mm
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
DNA Loft cushioning for soft and smooth transitions
Lightweight high-rebound midsole with 25 mm cushioning at heel
TrailTack rubber outsole for dependable wet and dry traction
SURFACE CTRL™ rubber with 4 mm grippy lugs
Breathable engineered mesh with synthetic overlays
N/A
N/A
null
N/A
N/A
Light toe protection and mud guard
N/A
Low-profile lugs optimized for mixed road and trail use
N/A
Balanced cushioning for everyday training comfort
N/A
Road-to-trail running, beginner trail running, daily training
Trail and mountain running
More Details
View on BrooksView on The North Face
Brooks Divide 6

Have you used the Brooks Divide 6 before?

Help the community by answering

The North Face Altamesa 300

Have you used the The North Face Altamesa 300 before?

Help the community by answering

What does the community think about Brooks Divide 6 and The North Face Altamesa 300?

Explore real user reviews and anonymized community insights to understand how these products perform in real-world Trail Runningsetups.

View Community Reviews

Visual Comparison

See the differences between Brooks Divide 6 and The North Face Altamesa 300 in a side-by-side slider comparison.

Brooks Divide 6
The North Face Altamesa 300

Comparison Questions

Answers based on product data and key differences.

Looking for alternatives to Brooks Divide 6?

Check out the Top 5 alternatives to Brooks Divide 6

View Alternatives