Craft Xplor Pro vs Merrell MTL Long Sky 2

Craft Xplor Pro

Craft Xplor Pro

$169.95
Merrell MTL Long Sky 2

Merrell MTL Long Sky 2

$170

Quick verdict

Craft Xplor Pro

$169.95

The better pick if you want:

  • More cushioning (38.5 vs 23.5 mm heel stack)

Merrell MTL Long Sky 2

$170

The better pick if you want:

  • A higher overall score (85 vs 76)
  • A lighter option (90 g less)
  • A lower drop (4 vs 6 mm)

Spec profile

Each axis ranks against the 173 products in Shoes on the site: the further out, the more it stands out in that spec (lighter, cheaper…).

Center: lowest in the category · Edge: highest

Craft Xplor Pro· leads in 2

CushioningAffordability

Merrell MTL Long Sky 2· leads in 1

Lightness
  • Cushioning

    39 mmTop 17%
    24 mm
  • Lightness

    325 g
    235 gTop 7%
  • Grip

    No data
    5 mmTop 13%
  • Drophigher isn't better or worse

    6 mm
    4 mm
  • Affordability

    $170
    $170

A spec without data for a product is left out of its shape, so it doesn't count as a low score.

Technical Specifications

Compare features between Craft Xplor Pro vs Merrell MTL Long Sky 2

Best value in this comparison

Essentials

$169.95
$170
2025
2022
325 g
235 g

Overview

Road-to-Trail Running Shoe
Trail Running Shoe
roads, gravel and hilly trails
Technical trails
Road-to-trail ultras, gravel runs and hilly races
Trail running on varied and technical terrain

Cushioning

6 mm
4 mm
38.5 mm
23.5 mm
32.5 mm
19.5 mm
Softer Px Foam™ ETPU midsole
FloatPro™ foam for lightweight durable cushioning
Soft, bouncy cushioning for long distances
—

Grip & protection

Vittoria outsole inspired by the Terreno gravel tyre with Sidewall Grip Tech
Vibram® MegaGrip high performance rubber with 5 mm lugs
TPU-reinforced woven upper
—
Fish-scale lug edges and progressive siping for mixed surfaces
—

Upper & fit

Lightweight woven mesh reinforced with TPU yarns
—
Removable sockliner
ETPU high rebound foam footbed
Craft Endurance Fit® with narrow heel cup, midfoot lock-in and roomy forefoot
—
Ready to buy?

On the terrain

How Craft Xplor Pro vs Merrell MTL Long Sky 2 should behave on each kind of ground, estimated from lug depth, stack height, weight and outsole rubber. Pick a ground to see what decides it.

Pick a groundAverage
Craft Xplor Pro49
Merrell MTL Long Sky 272

FlatPacked, runnable trail

Cushioning and low weight make the kilometres easier; very deep lugs squirm on hard ground.

Craft Xplor Pro69
  • Cushioning37/40
  • Lightness7/35
  • Smooth roll25/25

Estimated: no data on lug depth, assumed average.

Merrell MTL Long Sky 268
  • Cushioning20/40
  • Lightness31/35
  • Smooth roll17/25

A model built from the specs to compare shoes, not a lab measurement.

Craft Xplor Pro

Have you used the Craft Xplor Pro before?

Help the community by answering

Merrell MTL Long Sky 2

Have you used the Merrell MTL Long Sky 2 before?

Help the community by answering

Video Reviews

Watch real-world YouTube reviews from content creators and the Trail Running community.

See all 9 video reviews

Craft Xplor Pro

Merrell MTL Long Sky 2

Visual Comparison

See the differences between Craft Xplor Pro and Merrell MTL Long Sky 2 in a side-by-side slider comparison.

Craft Xplor Pro
Merrell MTL Long Sky 2

Comparison Questions

Answers based on product data and key differences.

Ask your own question

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask anything about Craft Xplor Pro vs Merrell MTL Long Sky 2 and our AI will answer.

Enter to send · Shift+Enter for a new line
Try asking:

Frequently Asked Questions

Which offers better value: Craft Xplor Pro vs Merrell MTL Long Sky 2?

For value comparison: The Craft Xplor Pro ($169.95) offers better affordability compared to the Merrell MTL Long Sky 2 ($170). Consider your budget and the specific features that matter most for your trail running setup.

Which is newer, the Craft Xplor Pro or the Merrell MTL Long Sky 2?

The Craft Xplor Pro is newer: it came out in 2025, and the Merrell MTL Long Sky 2 in 2022.

Looking for alternatives to Craft Xplor Pro?

Closest in price, with what each one does better.

See all alternatives