Joma Shock vs Joma Tundra

Joma Shock

€51

Joma Tundra

€67

Quick verdict

Joma Shock

€51

The better pick if you want:

A higher overall score (77 vs 69)
To spend $16 less

Joma Tundra

€67

The better pick if you want:

No clear advantage on the specs we track.

Spec profile

Each axis ranks against the 174 products in Shoes on the site: the further out, the more it stands out in that spec (lighter, cheaper…).

Center: lowest in the category · Edge: highest

Joma Shock· leads in none

Joma Tundra· leads in none

Tied

Affordability

Cushioning
No data
27 mm
Grip
No data
4 mmTop 50%
Drophigher isn't better or worse
8 mm
7 mm
Affordability
$51Top 1%
$67Top 2%

A spec without data for a product is left out of its shape, so it doesn't count as a low score.

Technical Specifications

Compare features between Joma Shock vs Joma Tundra

Best value in this comparisonOnly differences (13)

Essentials

€51

€67

Overview

Trail Running Shoe

Technical/Medium difficulty trails

Low to medium difficulty trails and forest paths

Trail running initiation, forest walking, and short trail distances up to ~20 km

Trail training at an easy to moderate pace (4:00-5:30 min/km), short to medium distances

Cushioning

8 mm

7 mm

—

27 mm

—

20 mm

Phylon lightweight cushioning

Phylon foam, light and flexible to soften impacts

—

Medium cushioning and wide fit for everyday training

Grip & protection

DURABILITY rubber with grip pattern

DURABILITY abrasion-resistant rubber with 4 mm bidirectional lugs

—

Thermosealed PROTECTION toe cap against impacts

—

Bidirectional lugs for grip on climbs and descents

Upper & fit

—

Breathable technical mesh with VTS ventilation to reduce heat build-up

—

Thermosealed JOMA SPORTECH overlays for a secure hold, wide last, traditional laces

Ready to buy?

On the terrain

How Joma Shock vs Joma Tundra should behave on each kind of ground, estimated from lug depth, stack height, weight and outsole rubber. Pick a ground to see what decides it.

Pick a ground							Average
Joma Shock							52
Joma Tundra							52

FlatPacked, runnable trail

Cushioning and low weight make the kilometres easier; very deep lugs squirm on hard ground.

Joma Shock63

Cushioning22/40
Lightness16/35
Smooth roll25/25

Estimated: no data on stack height, lug depth, weight, assumed average.

Joma Tundra61

Cushioning20/40
Lightness16/35
Smooth roll25/25

Estimated: no data on weight, assumed average.

A model built from the specs to compare shoes, not a lab measurement.

Have you used the Joma Shock before?

Help the community by answering

Have you used the Joma Tundra before?

Help the community by answering

Video Reviews

Watch real-world YouTube reviews from content creators and the Trail Running community.

See all 10 video reviews

Joma Shock

Joma Tundra

Visual Comparison

See the differences between Joma Shock and Joma Tundra in a side-by-side slider comparison.

Comparison Questions

Answers based on product data and key differences.

Ask your own question

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask anything about Joma Shock vs Joma Tundra and our AI will answer.

Try asking:

Frequently Asked Questions

Which offers better value: Joma Shock vs Joma Tundra?

For value comparison: The Joma Shock ($51) offers better affordability compared to the Joma Tundra ($67). Consider your budget and the specific features that matter most for your trail running setup.

Looking for alternatives to Joma Shock?

Closest in price, with what each one does better.

See all alternatives

Asics Gel Venture 10

Asics

$56+$5Score 63−14

Compare with Joma Shock

Salomon Temper

Salomon

$60+$9Score 61−16

Compare with Joma Shock

Joma Sierra 6

Joma

$78+$27Score 67−10

Better than Joma Shock at:

A lower drop (6 vs 8 mm)

This product is unavailable.

Compare with Joma Shock

Popular Comparisons

Compare Joma Shock or Joma Tundra with other top trail running shoes from brands such as Joma, Joma and more.

Shoes

Spec profile

Each axis ranks against the 174 products in Shoes on the site: the further out, the more it stands out in that spec (lighter, cheaper…).

Center: lowest in the category · Edge: highest

Joma Shock· leads in none

Joma Tundra· leads in none

Tied

Affordability

Cushioning
No data
27 mm
Grip
No data
4 mmTop 50%
Drophigher isn't better or worse
8 mm
7 mm
Affordability
$51Top 1%
$67Top 2%

A spec without data for a product is left out of its shape, so it doesn't count as a low score.

Pick a ground

Average

Joma Shock

Joma Tundra

Joma Shock vs Joma Tundra

Joma Shock

Joma Tundra

Quick verdict

Spec profile