Joma Shock
$51
The North Face Altamesa 300
$120
Why is The North Face Altamesa 300 better than Joma Shock?
Technical Specifications
Compare features between Joma Shock vs The North Face Altamesa 300
Feature | Joma Shock | The North Face Altamesa 300 |
|---|---|---|
51 $ | 120 $ BEST | |
Trail Running Shoe | Trail Running Shoe | |
Technical/Medium difficulty trails | Gravel paths and mountain trails | |
8 mm BEST | 6 mm | |
N/A | N/A | |
N/A | N/A | |
Phylon lightweight cushioning | Lightweight high-rebound midsole with 25 mm cushioning at heel | |
DURABILITY rubber with grip pattern | SURFACE CTRL™ rubber with 4 mm grippy lugs | |
N/A | N/A | |
N/A | null | |
N/A | N/A | |
N/A | N/A | |
N/A | N/A | |
N/A | N/A | |
Trail running initiation, forest walking, and short trail distances up to ~20 km | Trail and mountain running | |
More Details | View on Joma | View on The North Face |
Have you used the Joma Shock before?
Help the community by answering
Have you used the The North Face Altamesa 300 before?
Help the community by answering
What does the community think about Joma Shock and The North Face Altamesa 300?
Explore real user reviews and anonymized community insights to understand how these products perform in real-world Trail Runningsetups.
Visual Comparison
See the differences between Joma Shock and The North Face Altamesa 300 in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Comparison Questions
Answers based on product data and key differences.
Looking for alternatives to Joma Shock?
Check out the Top 5 alternatives to Joma Shock
Popular Comparisons
Compare Joma Shock or The North Face Altamesa 300 with other top trail running shoes from brands such as Joma, The North Face and more.
