Joma Sierra 6
Puma Fast Trac Nitro 4
Quick verdict
Joma Sierra 6
$78
The better pick if you want:
- To spend $62 less
- A lower drop (6 vs 12 mm)
Puma Fast Trac Nitro 4
$140
The better pick if you want:
- A higher overall score (23 vs 7)
- A lighter option (18 g less)
- More cushioning (31 vs 26 mm heel stack)
Spec profile
Each axis ranks against the 150 products in Shoes on the site: the further out, the more it stands out in that spec (lighter, cheaper…).
Center: lowest in the category · Edge: highest
Joma Sierra 6· leads in 1
Puma Fast Trac Nitro 4· leads in 2
Cushioning
26 mm31 mmLightness
290 g272 gTop 30%Drophigher isn't better or worse
6 mm12 mmAffordability
$78Top 3%$140Top 23%
Technical Specifications
Compare features between Joma Sierra 6 vs Puma Fast Trac Nitro 4
Essentials
Overview
Cushioning
Grip & protection
Have you used the Joma Sierra 6 before?
Help the community by answering
Have you used the Puma Fast Trac Nitro 4 before?
Help the community by answering
Video Reviews
Watch real-world YouTube reviews from content creators and the Trail Running community.
Joma Sierra 6
Puma Fast Trac Nitro 4
Visual Comparison
See the differences between Joma Sierra 6 and Puma Fast Trac Nitro 4 in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Comparison Questions
Answers based on product data and key differences.
Ask your own question
Can't find what you're looking for? Ask anything about Joma Sierra 6 vs Puma Fast Trac Nitro 4 and our AI will answer.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which offers better value: Joma Sierra 6 vs Puma Fast Trac Nitro 4?
For value comparison: The Joma Sierra 6 ($78) offers better affordability compared to the Puma Fast Trac Nitro 4 ($140). Consider your budget and the specific features that matter most for your trail running setup.
Looking for alternatives to Joma Sierra 6?
Closest in price, with what each one does better.
Adidas
Better than Joma Sierra 6 at:
- More cushioning (30 vs 26 mm heel stack)
Asics
Better than Joma Sierra 6 at:
- More cushioning (35.5 vs 26 mm heel stack)
