%20skewX(-12)%22%20fill%3D%22none%22%20stroke%3D%22%23000000%22%20stroke-width%3D%228.5%22%20stroke-linecap%3D%22square%22%20stroke-linejoin%3D%22round%22%3E%0A%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%3Cpath%20d%3D%22M27%2059%20L37%2083%20L47%2059%22%2F%3E%0A%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%3Cpath%20d%3D%22M77%2055%20L63.5%2055%20Q60%2055%2060%2058.5%20L60%2063.5%20Q60%2067%2063.5%2067%20L73.5%2067%20Q77%2067%2077%2070.5%20L77%2075.5%20Q77%2079%2073.5%2079%20L59%2079%22%2F%3E%0A%20%20%20%20%20%20%3C%2Fg%3E%0A%20%20%20%20%3C%2Fmask%3E%0A%20%20%3C%2Fdefs%3E%0A%20%20%3Cg%20clip-path%3D%22url(%23tile)%22%3E%0A%20%20%20%20%3Crect%20width%3D%22100%22%20height%3D%22100%22%20fill%3D%22none%22%2F%3E%0A%20%20%20%20%3Cpath%20d%3D%22M-34%20104%20L16%2055%20L50%2025%20L70%2047%20L81%2043%20L90%2043%20L140%20104%20Z%22%20fill%3D%22%23ffffff%22%20stroke%3D%22%23ffffff%22%20stroke-width%3D%228%22%20stroke-linejoin%3D%22round%22%20mask%3D%22url(%23vs)%22%2F%3E%0A%20%20%3C%2Fg%3E%0A%3C%2Fsvg%3E%0A){kind=small}
Joma Tundra
€67
The better pick if you want:
New Balance DynaSoft Nitrel v6
€80
The better pick if you want:
No clear advantage on the specs we track.
Each axis ranks against the 174 products in Shoes on the site: the further out, the more it stands out in that spec (lighter, cheaper…).
Center: lowest in the category · Edge: highest
Joma Tundra· leads in 1
New Balance DynaSoft Nitrel v6· leads in none
Tied
Cushioning
Lightness
Grip
Drophigher isn't better or worse
Affordability
A spec without data for a product is left out of its shape, so it doesn't count as a low score.
Compare features between Joma Tundra vs New Balance DynaSoft Nitrel v6
How Joma Tundra vs New Balance DynaSoft Nitrel v6 should behave on each kind of ground, estimated from lug depth, stack height, weight and outsole rubber. Pick a ground to see what decides it.
| Pick a ground | Average | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joma Tundra | 52 | ||||||
| New Balance DynaSoft Nitrel v6 | 42 |
Cushioning and low weight make the kilometres easier; very deep lugs squirm on hard ground.
Estimated: no data on weight, assumed average.
Estimated: no data on stack height, assumed average.
A model built from the specs to compare shoes, not a lab measurement.
Help the community by answering
Help the community by answering
Watch real-world YouTube reviews from content creators and the Trail Running community.
See the differences between Joma Tundra and New Balance DynaSoft Nitrel v6 in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Answers based on product data and key differences.
Can't find what you're looking for? Ask anything about Joma Tundra vs New Balance DynaSoft Nitrel v6 and our AI will answer.
For value comparison: The Joma Tundra ($67) offers better affordability compared to the New Balance DynaSoft Nitrel v6 ($80). Consider your budget and the specific features that matter most for your trail running setup.
Closest in price, with what each one does better.
Asics
Better than Joma Tundra at:
Compare Joma Tundra or New Balance DynaSoft Nitrel v6 with other top trail running shoes from brands such as Joma, New Balance and more.
