Joma Tundra
$67
The North Face Altamesa 300
$120
Why is The North Face Altamesa 300 better than Joma Tundra?
Technical Specifications
Compare features between Joma Tundra vs The North Face Altamesa 300
Feature | Joma Tundra | The North Face Altamesa 300 |
|---|---|---|
67 $ | 120 $ BEST | |
Trail Running Shoe | Trail Running Shoe | |
Medium/Low difficulty trails | Gravel paths and mountain trails | |
7 mm BEST | 6 mm | |
N/A | N/A | |
N/A | N/A | |
Phylon lightweight cushioning | Lightweight high-rebound midsole with 25 mm cushioning at heel | |
DURABILITY rubber with bidirectional studs for traction | SURFACE CTRL™ rubber with 4 mm grippy lugs | |
N/A | N/A | |
N/A | null | |
N/A | N/A | |
N/A | N/A | |
N/A | N/A | |
N/A | N/A | |
Trail running training and short trail distances up to ~20 km | Trail and mountain running | |
More Details | View on Joma | View on The North Face |
Have you used the Joma Tundra before?
Help the community by answering
Have you used the The North Face Altamesa 300 before?
Help the community by answering
What does the community think about Joma Tundra and The North Face Altamesa 300?
Explore real user reviews and anonymized community insights to understand how these products perform in real-world Trail Runningsetups.
Visual Comparison
See the differences between Joma Tundra and The North Face Altamesa 300 in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Comparison Questions
Answers based on product data and key differences.
Looking for alternatives to Joma Tundra?
Check out the Top 5 alternatives to Joma Tundra
Popular Comparisons
Compare Joma Tundra or The North Face Altamesa 300 with other top trail running shoes from brands such as Joma, The North Face and more.
