LOWA Citux
$170
The North Face Altamesa 300
$120
Why is LOWA Citux better than The North Face Altamesa 300?
Technical Specifications
Compare features between LOWA Citux vs The North Face Altamesa 300
Feature | LOWA Citux | The North Face Altamesa 300 |
|---|---|---|
170 $ BEST | 120 $ | |
Trail Running Shoe | Trail Running Shoe | |
Technical mountain trails and fast trail running | Gravel paths and mountain trails | |
4 mm | 6 mm BEST | |
N/A | N/A | |
N/A | N/A | |
Triple-density EVA with LOWA® DYNAEVA® and carbon-reinforced Rebound Plate | Lightweight high-rebound midsole with 25 mm cushioning at heel | |
LOWA® TRAC® or LOWA® TRAC® SPEED rubber outsole for traction | SURFACE CTRL™ rubber with 4 mm grippy lugs | |
N/A | N/A | |
N/A | null | |
N/A | N/A | |
N/A | N/A | |
N/A | N/A | |
N/A | N/A | |
Fast-paced trail running, skyrunning and technical mountain trail events | Trail and mountain running | |
More Details | View on LOWA | View on The North Face |
Have you used the LOWA Citux before?
Help the community by answering
Have you used the The North Face Altamesa 300 before?
Help the community by answering
What does the community think about LOWA Citux and The North Face Altamesa 300?
Explore real user reviews and anonymized community insights to understand how these products perform in real-world Trail Runningsetups.
Visual Comparison
See the differences between LOWA Citux and The North Face Altamesa 300 in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Comparison Questions
Answers based on product data and key differences.
Looking for alternatives to LOWA Citux?
Check out the Top 5 alternatives to LOWA Citux
Popular Comparisons
Compare LOWA Citux or The North Face Altamesa 300 with other top trail running shoes from brands such as LOWA, The North Face and more.
