norda 002
$295
The North Face Altamesa 300
$120
Why is norda 002 better than The North Face Altamesa 300?
Technical Specifications
Compare features between norda 002 vs The North Face Altamesa 300
Feature | norda 002 | The North Face Altamesa 300 |
|---|---|---|
295 $ BEST | 120 $ | |
272 g | N/A | |
Trail Running Shoe | Trail Running Shoe | |
Technical mountain terrain | Gravel paths and mountain trails | |
4 mm | 6 mm BEST | |
30 mm | N/A | |
26 mm | N/A | |
Responsive lower-stack midsole | Lightweight high-rebound midsole with 25 mm cushioning at heel | |
Vibram® Megagrip Litebase | SURFACE CTRL™ rubber with 4 mm grippy lugs | |
Seamless Bio-Dyneema® upper | N/A | |
Removable sockliner | null | |
Precise fit with traditional lacing | N/A | |
Cut and abrasion resistant Dyneema upper | N/A | |
Vibram® Megagrip Litebase lugs | N/A | |
Firm and precise with good ground feel | N/A | |
Technical trails, skyrunning and short to mid distances | Trail and mountain running | |
More Details | View on Running Warehouse | View on The North Face |
Have you used the norda 002 before?
Help the community by answering
Have you used the The North Face Altamesa 300 before?
Help the community by answering
What does the community think about norda 002 and The North Face Altamesa 300?
Explore real user reviews and anonymized community insights to understand how these products perform in real-world Trail Runningsetups.
Visual Comparison
See the differences between norda 002 and The North Face Altamesa 300 in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Comparison Questions
Answers based on product data and key differences.
Looking for alternatives to norda 002?
Check out the Top 5 alternatives to norda 002
Popular Comparisons
Compare norda 002 or The North Face Altamesa 300 with other top trail running shoes from brands such as norda, The North Face and more.
