Salomon Pulsar
$150
The North Face Altamesa 300
$120
Why is Salomon Pulsar better than The North Face Altamesa 300?
Technical Specifications
Compare features between Salomon Pulsar vs The North Face Altamesa 300
Feature | Salomon Pulsar | The North Face Altamesa 300 |
|---|---|---|
150 $ BEST | 120 $ | |
281 g | N/A | |
Trail Running Shoe | Trail Running Shoe | |
mixed trail, smooth & rocky paths | Gravel paths and mountain trails | |
6 mm | 6 mm | |
N/A | N/A | |
N/A | N/A | |
optiFOAM² / superfoam cushioning | Lightweight high-rebound midsole with 25 mm cushioning at heel | |
All Terrain Contagrip® rubber with moderate lugs | SURFACE CTRL™ rubber with 4 mm grippy lugs | |
Synthetic/textile mesh with SensiFit™ | N/A | |
Standard sockliner | null | |
N/A | N/A | |
High foot protection | N/A | |
N/A | N/A | |
Moderate cushioning with energy return | N/A | |
N/A | Trail and mountain running | |
More Details | View on Salomon | View on The North Face |
Have you used the Salomon Pulsar before?
Help the community by answering
Have you used the The North Face Altamesa 300 before?
Help the community by answering
What does the community think about Salomon Pulsar and The North Face Altamesa 300?
Explore real user reviews and anonymized community insights to understand how these products perform in real-world Trail Runningsetups.
Visual Comparison
See the differences between Salomon Pulsar and The North Face Altamesa 300 in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Comparison Questions
Answers based on product data and key differences.
Looking for alternatives to Salomon Pulsar?
Check out the Top 5 alternatives to Salomon Pulsar
Popular Comparisons
Compare Salomon Pulsar or The North Face Altamesa 300 with other top trail running shoes from brands such as Salomon, The North Face and more.
