New Balance
Better than Saucony Peregrine 16 at:
- A higher overall score (88 vs 77)
- More cushioning (42 vs 33 mm heel stack)
Saucony Peregrine 16
$160
The better pick if you want:
Saucony Xodus Ultra 4
$170
The better pick if you want:
Each axis ranks against the 174 products in Shoes on the site: the further out, the more it stands out in that spec (lighter, cheaper…).
Center: lowest in the category · Edge: highest
Saucony Peregrine 16· leads in 2
Saucony Xodus Ultra 4· leads in 1
Tied
Cushioning
Lightness
Grip
Drophigher isn't better or worse
Affordability
Compare features between Saucony Peregrine 16 vs Saucony Xodus Ultra 4
How Saucony Peregrine 16 vs Saucony Xodus Ultra 4 should behave on each kind of ground, estimated from lug depth, stack height, weight and outsole rubber. Pick a ground to see what decides it.
| Pick a ground | Average | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 58 | |||||||
| 56 |
Cushioning and low weight make the kilometres easier; very deep lugs squirm on hard ground.
A model built from the specs to compare shoes, not a lab measurement.
Help the community by answering
Help the community by answering
Watch real-world YouTube reviews from content creators and the Trail Running community.
See the differences between Saucony Peregrine 16 and Saucony Xodus Ultra 4 in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Answers based on product data and key differences.
Can't find what you're looking for? Ask anything about Saucony Peregrine 16 vs Saucony Xodus Ultra 4 and our AI will answer.
For value comparison: The Saucony Peregrine 16 ($160) offers better affordability compared to the Saucony Xodus Ultra 4 ($170). Consider your budget and the specific features that matter most for your trail running setup.
The Saucony Peregrine 16 is newer: it came out in 2026, and the Saucony Xodus Ultra 4 in 2025.
Closest in price, with what each one does better.
New Balance
Better than Saucony Peregrine 16 at:

INOV-8
Better than Saucony Peregrine 16 at:
Asics
Better than Saucony Peregrine 16 at: