The North Face Altamesa 500 vs The North Face Vectiv Enduris 4

The North Face Altamesa 500

€140

The North Face Vectiv Enduris 4

€160

Quick verdict

The North Face Altamesa 500

€140

The better pick if you want:

A higher overall score (82 vs 73)
To spend $20 less
More cushioning (36 vs 32 mm heel stack)

The North Face Vectiv Enduris 4

€160

The better pick if you want:

No clear advantage on the specs we track.

Spec profile

Each axis ranks against the 174 products in Shoes on the site: the further out, the more it stands out in that spec (lighter, cheaper…).

Center: lowest in the category · Edge: highest

The North Face Altamesa 500· leads in 3

CushioningLightnessAffordability

The North Face Vectiv Enduris 4· leads in none

Tied

Grip

Cushioning
36 mmTop 35%
32 mm
Lightness
285 gTop 46%
287 g
Grip
4 mmTop 50%
4 mmTop 50%
Drophigher isn't better or worse
6 mm
6 mm
Affordability
$140Top 26%
$160

Technical Specifications

Compare features between The North Face Altamesa 500 vs The North Face Vectiv Enduris 4

Best value in this comparisonOnly differences (9)

Essentials

€140

€160

2024

2025

285 g

287 g

Overview

Trail Running Shoe

Gravel paths and mountain trails

Technical and varied trail terrain

Trail running and mountain training

Trail running, training and long-distance runs

Cushioning

6 mm

36 mm

32 mm

30 mm

26 mm

DREAM foam for lightweight cushioning and rebound

DREAM nitrogen-infused TPU with rocker geometry

Grip & protection

SURFACE CTRL™ rubber with 4 mm grippy lugs

Surface CTRL rubber with multidirectional 4 mm lugs

Ready to buy?

On the terrain

How The North Face Altamesa 500 vs The North Face Vectiv Enduris 4 should behave on each kind of ground, estimated from lug depth, stack height, weight and outsole rubber. Pick a ground to see what decides it.

Pick a ground							Average
The North Face Altamesa 500							54
The North Face Vectiv Enduris 4							53

FlatPacked, runnable trail

Cushioning and low weight make the kilometres easier; very deep lugs squirm on hard ground.

The North Face Altamesa 50076

Cushioning33/40
Lightness18/35
Smooth roll25/25

The North Face Vectiv Enduris 467

Cushioning25/40
Lightness17/35
Smooth roll25/25

A model built from the specs to compare shoes, not a lab measurement.

Have you used the The North Face Altamesa 500 before?

Help the community by answering

Have you used the The North Face Vectiv Enduris 4 before?

Help the community by answering

Video Reviews

Watch real-world YouTube reviews from content creators and the Trail Running community.

See all 10 video reviews

The North Face Altamesa 500

The North Face Vectiv Enduris 4

Visual Comparison

See the differences between The North Face Altamesa 500 and The North Face Vectiv Enduris 4 in a side-by-side slider comparison.

Comparison Questions

Answers based on product data and key differences.

Ask your own question

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask anything about The North Face Altamesa 500 vs The North Face Vectiv Enduris 4 and our AI will answer.

Try asking:

Frequently Asked Questions

Which offers better value: The North Face Altamesa 500 vs The North Face Vectiv Enduris 4?

For value comparison: The The North Face Altamesa 500 ($140) offers better affordability compared to the The North Face Vectiv Enduris 4 ($160). Consider your budget and the specific features that matter most for your trail running setup.

Which is newer, the The North Face Altamesa 500 or the The North Face Vectiv Enduris 4?

The The North Face Vectiv Enduris 4 is newer: it came out in 2025, and the The North Face Altamesa 500 in 2024.

Looking for alternatives to The North Face Altamesa 500?

Closest in price, with what each one does better.

See all alternatives

Adidas Terrex Agravic 3

Adidas

$140Score 87+5

Better than The North Face Altamesa 500 at:

A higher overall score (87 vs 82)
A lighter option (10 g less)

Compare with The North Face Altamesa 500

Asics Fuji Lite 6

Asics

$140Score 85+3

Better than The North Face Altamesa 500 at:

A higher overall score (85 vs 82)
A lighter option (25 g less)
A lower drop (4 vs 6 mm)

Compare with The North Face Altamesa 500

Asics Fuji Lite 7

Asics

$140Score 83+1

Better than The North Face Altamesa 500 at:

A lighter option (44 g less)
A lower drop (4 vs 6 mm)

Compare with The North Face Altamesa 500

Popular Comparisons

Compare The North Face Altamesa 500 or The North Face Vectiv Enduris 4 with other top trail running shoes from brands such as The North Face, The North Face and more.

Shoes

Spec profile

Each axis ranks against the 174 products in Shoes on the site: the further out, the more it stands out in that spec (lighter, cheaper…).

Center: lowest in the category · Edge: highest

The North Face Altamesa 500· leads in 3

CushioningLightnessAffordability

The North Face Vectiv Enduris 4· leads in none

Tied

Grip

Cushioning
36 mmTop 35%
32 mm
Lightness
285 gTop 46%
287 g
Grip
4 mmTop 50%
4 mmTop 50%
Drophigher isn't better or worse
6 mm
6 mm
Affordability
$140Top 26%
$160

Pick a ground

Average

The North Face Altamesa 500

The North Face Vectiv Enduris 4

The North Face Altamesa 500 vs The North Face Vectiv Enduris 4

The North Face Altamesa 500

The North Face Vectiv Enduris 4

Quick verdict

Spec profile