Garmin Forerunner 170
$300
Polar Pacer
$149
Why is Garmin Forerunner 170 better than Polar Pacer?
Technical Specifications
Compare features between Garmin Forerunner 170 vs Polar Pacer
Feature | Garmin Forerunner 170 | Polar Pacer |
|---|---|---|
300 $ BEST | 149 $ | |
AMOLED | N/A | |
1.2 inch (43 mm) | N/A | |
N/A | N/A | |
Yes | No | |
Yes | No | |
Up to 10 days | Up to 7 days | |
Up to 20 hours | N/A | |
N/A | N/A | |
Fibre-reinforced polymer | N/A | |
N/A | N/A | |
N/A | N/A | |
5 ATM | WR50 (suitable for swimming) | |
N/A (4 GB music on Music edition) | N/A | |
Garmin Pay, Heart Rate Monitor, Body Battery Energy Monitor, Barometric Altimeter, Compass | Sport Modes, Training Load And Recovery, Sleep Tracking, Route Navigation, Komoot Integration, Notifications | |
More Details | View on Running Warehouse | View on Polar |
Have you used the Garmin Forerunner 170 before?
Help the community by answering
Have you used the Polar Pacer before?
Help the community by answering
What does the community think about Garmin Forerunner 170 and Polar Pacer?
Explore real user reviews and anonymized community insights to understand how these products perform in real-world Trail Runningsetups.
Visual Comparison
See the differences between Garmin Forerunner 170 and Polar Pacer in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Comparison Questions
Answers based on product data and key differences.
Looking for alternatives to Garmin Forerunner 170?
Check out the Top 5 alternatives to Garmin Forerunner 170
/filters:quality(90)/fit-in/612x944/coros-v2/images/apex4/shopping/battery.png)
