COOSPO H808S vs COOSPO H9Z

COOSPO H808S

$30

COOSPO H9Z

$38

Quick verdict

COOSPO H808S

$30

The better pick if you want:

A higher overall score (68 vs 64)
To spend $8 less

COOSPO H9Z

$38

The better pick if you want:

No clear advantage on the specs we track.

Spec profile

Each axis ranks against the 14 products in Heart Rate Monitor on the site: the further out, the more it stands out in that spec (lighter, cheaper…).

Center: lowest in the category · Edge: highest

COOSPO H808S· leads in 2

Battery lifeAffordability

COOSPO H9Z· leads in 1

Lightness

Tied

FeaturesRangeWater resistance

Battery life
300 hTop 39%
50 h
Features
3Top 46%
3Top 46%
Range
10 m
10 m
Water resistance
1 m
1 m
Lightness
46 g
45 gTop 46%
Affordability
$30Top 4%
$38Top 11%

Technical Specifications

Compare features between COOSPO H808S vs COOSPO H9Z

Best value in this comparisonOnly differences (7)

Essentials

$30

$38

2020

—

Overview

Electrical (ECG-based chest strap)

ECG heart rate sensor

Accurate ECG-based heart rate measurement, Stable signal ideal for high-intensity training, ANT+ and Bluetooth compatibility with multiple devices, Lightweight and comfortable chest strap design, Long battery life with replaceable battery

High-accuracy ECG-based heart rate tracking, More precise data compared to optical sensors, Dual Bluetooth and ANT+ connectivity, Supports simultaneous connection to multiple devices, Rechargeable battery, no coin cells to replace

Connectivity

ANT+, Bluetooth Low Energy

Bluetooth Low Energy, ANT+

Yes

Up to 10 m (Bluetooth), extended with ANT+

Battery

Replaceable (CR2032 coin cell)

Rechargeable (charging dock)

Up to 300 hours (about 1 hour of training per day)

Up to 50 hours (continuous use)

Build & durability

IP67 (1 m immersion, not suitable for swimming)

-10°C to 50°C

46 g (sensor + strap)

Approx. 45 g (sensor + strap)

Elastic fabric with conductive electrodes

ABS plastic

Ready to buy?

Have you used the COOSPO H808S before?

Help the community by answering

Have you used the COOSPO H9Z before?

Help the community by answering

Video Reviews

Watch real-world YouTube reviews from content creators and the Trail Running community.

See all 10 video reviews

COOSPO H808S

COOSPO H9Z

Visual Comparison

See the differences between COOSPO H808S and COOSPO H9Z in a side-by-side slider comparison.

Comparison Questions

Answers based on product data and key differences.

Ask your own question

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask anything about COOSPO H808S vs COOSPO H9Z and our AI will answer.

Try asking:

Frequently Asked Questions

Which offers better value: COOSPO H808S vs COOSPO H9Z?

For value comparison: The COOSPO H808S ($30) offers better affordability compared to the COOSPO H9Z ($38). Consider your budget and the specific features that matter most for your trail running setup.

Looking for alternatives to COOSPO H808S?

Closest in price, with what each one does better.

See all alternatives

COOSPO HW9

COOSPO

$47+$17Score 68

Compare with COOSPO H808S

Polar H9

Polar

$64.9+$34.90Score 80+12

Better than COOSPO H808S at:

A higher overall score (80 vs 68)

Compare with COOSPO H808S

Suunto Smart Heart Rate Belt

Suunto

$79+$49Score 85+17

Better than COOSPO H808S at:

A higher overall score (85 vs 68)

Compare with COOSPO H808S

Popular Comparisons

Compare COOSPO H808S or COOSPO H9Z with other top trail running heart rate monitor from brands such as COOSPO, COOSPO and more.

Heart Rate Monitor

Spec profile

Each axis ranks against the 14 products in Heart Rate Monitor on the site: the further out, the more it stands out in that spec (lighter, cheaper…).

Center: lowest in the category · Edge: highest

COOSPO H808S· leads in 2

Battery lifeAffordability

COOSPO H9Z· leads in 1

Lightness

Tied

FeaturesRangeWater resistance

Battery life
300 hTop 39%
50 h
Features
3Top 46%
3Top 46%
Range
10 m
10 m
Water resistance
1 m
1 m
Lightness
46 g
45 gTop 46%
Affordability
$30Top 4%
$38Top 11%

COOSPO H808S vs COOSPO H9Z

COOSPO H808S

COOSPO H9Z

Quick verdict

Spec profile