COOSPO H808S vs Polar H9

COOSPO H808S

$30

Polar H9

€64.90

Quick verdict

COOSPO H808S

$30

The better pick if you want:

To spend $34.90 less

Polar H9

€64.90

The better pick if you want:

A higher overall score (80 vs 68)

Spec profile

Each axis ranks against the 14 products in Heart Rate Monitor on the site: the further out, the more it stands out in that spec (lighter, cheaper…).

Center: lowest in the category · Edge: highest

COOSPO H808S· leads in 3

FeaturesLightnessAffordability

Polar H9· leads in 3

Battery lifeRangeWater resistance

Battery life
300 hTop 39%
400 hTop 21%
Features
3Top 46%
2
Range
10 m
90 mTop 20%
Water resistance
1 m
30 mTop 43%
Lightness
46 g
60 g
Affordability
$30Top 4%
$65Top 25%

Technical Specifications

Compare features between COOSPO H808S vs Polar H9

Best value in this comparisonOnly differences (14)

Essentials

$30

€64.90

2020

January 2020

Overview

Electrical (ECG-based chest strap)

ECG (electrical heart rate measurement)

ECG heart rate sensor

—

Accurate ECG-based heart rate measurement, Stable signal ideal for high-intensity training, ANT+ and Bluetooth compatibility with multiple devices, Lightweight and comfortable chest strap design, Long battery life with replaceable battery

Accurate ECG-based heart rate tracking, Real-time heart rate monitoring, Comfortable soft textile strap, OwnCode coded transmission, Compatible with a wide range of devices and apps

Connectivity

ANT+, Bluetooth Low Energy

Bluetooth Low Energy, ANT+, GymLink 5 kHz

Yes

Up to 10 m (Bluetooth), extended with ANT+

Up to 90 m

Battery

Replaceable (CR2032 coin cell)

CR2025 coin cell

Up to 300 hours (about 1 hour of training per day)

Up to 400 hours (about 1 hour of training per day)

Build & durability

IP67 (1 m immersion, not suitable for swimming)

WR30 (30 meters)

-10°C to 50°C

46 g (sensor + strap)

60 g

Elastic fabric with conductive electrodes

Polyamide, polyurethane, elastane, polyester with silicone prints

ABS plastic

Plastic

Ready to buy?

Have you used the COOSPO H808S before?

Help the community by answering

Have you used the Polar H9 before?

Help the community by answering

Video Reviews

Watch real-world YouTube reviews from content creators and the Trail Running community.

See all 10 video reviews

COOSPO H808S

Polar H9

Visual Comparison

See the differences between COOSPO H808S and Polar H9 in a side-by-side slider comparison.

Comparison Questions

Answers based on product data and key differences.

Ask your own question

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask anything about COOSPO H808S vs Polar H9 and our AI will answer.

Try asking:

Frequently Asked Questions

Which offers better value: COOSPO H808S vs Polar H9?

For value comparison: The COOSPO H808S ($30) offers better affordability compared to the Polar H9 ($64.9). Consider your budget and the specific features that matter most for your trail running setup.

Which is newer, the COOSPO H808S or the Polar H9?

Both came out in 2020.

Looking for alternatives to COOSPO H808S?

Closest in price, with what each one does better.

See all alternatives

COOSPO H9Z

COOSPO

$38+$8Score 64−4

Compare with COOSPO H808S

COOSPO HW9

COOSPO

$47+$17Score 68

Compare with COOSPO H808S

Suunto Smart Heart Rate Belt

Suunto

$79+$49Score 85+17

Better than COOSPO H808S at:

A higher overall score (85 vs 68)

Compare with COOSPO H808S

Popular Comparisons

Compare COOSPO H808S or Polar H9 with other top trail running heart rate monitor from brands such as COOSPO, Polar and more.

Heart Rate Monitor

Spec profile

Each axis ranks against the 14 products in Heart Rate Monitor on the site: the further out, the more it stands out in that spec (lighter, cheaper…).

Center: lowest in the category · Edge: highest

COOSPO H808S· leads in 3

FeaturesLightnessAffordability

Polar H9· leads in 3

Battery lifeRangeWater resistance

Battery life
300 hTop 39%
400 hTop 21%
Features
3Top 46%
2
Range
10 m
90 mTop 20%
Water resistance
1 m
30 mTop 43%
Lightness
46 g
60 g
Affordability
$30Top 4%
$65Top 25%

COOSPO H808S vs Polar H9

COOSPO H808S

Polar H9

Quick verdict

Spec profile