Adidas Tracerocker 2
$120
The North Face Altamesa 300
$120
Technical Specifications
Compare features between Adidas Tracerocker 2 vs The North Face Altamesa 300
Feature | Adidas Tracerocker 2 | The North Face Altamesa 300 |
|---|---|---|
120 $ | 120 $ | |
Trail Running Shoe | Trail Running Shoe | |
Trail and off‑road terrain | Gravel paths and mountain trails | |
7 mm BEST | 6 mm | |
N/A | N/A | |
N/A | N/A | |
EVA cushioning for comfort and energy return | Lightweight high-rebound midsole with 25 mm cushioning at heel | |
Traxion rubber outsole with aggressive lugs for grip | SURFACE CTRL™ rubber with 4 mm grippy lugs | |
N/A | N/A | |
N/A | null | |
N/A | N/A | |
N/A | N/A | |
N/A | N/A | |
N/A | N/A | |
Trail running, hiking on wet or technical trails, off‑road runs | Trail and mountain running | |
More Details | View on Adidas | View on The North Face |
Have you used the Adidas Tracerocker 2 before?
Help the community by answering
Have you used the The North Face Altamesa 300 before?
Help the community by answering
What does the community think about Adidas Tracerocker 2 and The North Face Altamesa 300?
Explore real user reviews and anonymized community insights to understand how these products perform in real-world Trail Runningsetups.
Visual Comparison
See the differences between Adidas Tracerocker 2 and The North Face Altamesa 300 in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Comparison Questions
Answers based on product data and key differences.
Looking for alternatives to Adidas Tracerocker 2?
Check out the Top 5 alternatives to Adidas Tracerocker 2
Popular Comparisons
Compare Adidas Tracerocker 2 or The North Face Altamesa 300 with other top trail running shoes from brands such as Adidas, The North Face and more.
