
Joma
Better than Asics Trabuco 13 at:
- A higher overall score (85 vs 69)
- A lighter option (60 g less)
- More cushioning (38 vs 34 mm heel stack)

Asics Trabuco 13
$119
The better pick if you want:
Salomon SPEEDCROSS 6
£83.99
The better pick if you want:
Each axis ranks against the 174 products in Shoes on the site: the further out, the more it stands out in that spec (lighter, cheaper…).
Center: lowest in the category · Edge: highest
Asics Trabuco 13· leads in 2
Salomon SPEEDCROSS 6· leads in 2
Cushioning
Lightness
Grip
Drophigher isn't better or worse
Affordability
Compare features between Asics Trabuco 13 vs Salomon SPEEDCROSS 6
How Asics Trabuco 13 vs Salomon SPEEDCROSS 6 should behave on each kind of ground, estimated from lug depth, stack height, weight and outsole rubber. Pick a ground to see what decides it.
| Pick a ground | Average | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49 | |||||||
| 61 |
Cushioning and low weight make the kilometres easier; very deep lugs squirm on hard ground.
A model built from the specs to compare shoes, not a lab measurement.
Help the community by answering

Help the community by answering
Watch real-world YouTube reviews from content creators and the Trail Running community.
See the differences between Asics Trabuco 13 and Salomon SPEEDCROSS 6 in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Answers based on product data and key differences.
Can't find what you're looking for? Ask anything about Asics Trabuco 13 vs Salomon SPEEDCROSS 6 and our AI will answer.
For value comparison: The Asics Trabuco 13 ($119) offers better affordability compared to the Salomon SPEEDCROSS 6 ($150). Consider your budget and the specific features that matter most for your trail running setup.
The Asics Trabuco 13 is newer: it came out in 2025, and the Salomon SPEEDCROSS 6 in 2022.
Closest in price, with what each one does better.

Joma
Better than Asics Trabuco 13 at:

Joma
Better than Asics Trabuco 13 at:
Asics
Better than Asics Trabuco 13 at: