Asics Trabuco Max 5

Mizuno Neo Lumina GTX
Quick verdict
Asics Trabuco Max 5
$180
The better pick if you want:
- A higher overall score (33 vs 23)
- A lighter option (5 g less)
- More cushioning (38.5 vs 32 mm heel stack)
Mizuno Neo Lumina GTX
$140
The better pick if you want:
- To spend $40 less
Spec profile
Each axis ranks against the 150 products in Shoes on the site: the further out, the more it stands out in that spec (lighter, cheaper…).
Center: lowest in the category · Edge: highest
Asics Trabuco Max 5· leads in 2
Mizuno Neo Lumina GTX· leads in 1
Cushioning
39 mmTop 15%32 mmLightness
300 g305 gGrip
3.5 mmNo dataDrophigher isn't better or worse
5 mm6 mmAffordability
$180$140Top 23%
A spec without data for a product is left out of its shape, so it doesn't count as a low score.
Technical Specifications
Compare features between Asics Trabuco Max 5 vs Mizuno Neo Lumina GTX
Essentials
Overview
Cushioning
Grip & protection
Have you used the Asics Trabuco Max 5 before?
Help the community by answering

Have you used the Mizuno Neo Lumina GTX before?
Help the community by answering
Video Reviews
Watch real-world YouTube reviews from content creators and the Trail Running community.
Asics Trabuco Max 5
Mizuno Neo Lumina GTX
Visual Comparison
See the differences between Asics Trabuco Max 5 and Mizuno Neo Lumina GTX in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Comparison Questions
Answers based on product data and key differences.
Ask your own question
Can't find what you're looking for? Ask anything about Asics Trabuco Max 5 vs Mizuno Neo Lumina GTX and our AI will answer.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which offers better value: Asics Trabuco Max 5 vs Mizuno Neo Lumina GTX?
For value comparison: The Asics Trabuco Max 5 ($180) provides premium features compared to the Mizuno Neo Lumina GTX ($140). Consider your budget and the specific features that matter most for your trail running setup.
Looking for alternatives to Asics Trabuco Max 5?
Closest in price, with what each one does better.
Asics
Better than Asics Trabuco Max 5 at:
- A lighter option (60 g less)
- More cushioning (43 vs 38.5 mm heel stack)











