
Adidas
Better than Mizuno Neo Lumina GTX at:
- A higher overall score (87 vs 68)
- A lighter option (30 g less)

Mizuno Neo Lumina GTX
€140
The better pick if you want:
Puma Fast Trac Nitro 4
€140
The better pick if you want:
Each axis ranks against the 174 products in Shoes on the site: the further out, the more it stands out in that spec (lighter, cheaper…).
Center: lowest in the category · Edge: highest
Mizuno Neo Lumina GTX· leads in 1
Puma Fast Trac Nitro 4· leads in 1
Tied
Cushioning
Lightness
Drophigher isn't better or worse
Affordability
Compare features between Mizuno Neo Lumina GTX vs Puma Fast Trac Nitro 4
How Mizuno Neo Lumina GTX vs Puma Fast Trac Nitro 4 should behave on each kind of ground, estimated from lug depth, stack height, weight and outsole rubber. Pick a ground to see what decides it.
| Pick a ground | Average | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51 | |||||||
| 58 |
Cushioning and low weight make the kilometres easier; very deep lugs squirm on hard ground.
Estimated: no data on lug depth, assumed average.
Estimated: no data on lug depth, assumed average.
A model built from the specs to compare shoes, not a lab measurement.

Help the community by answering
Help the community by answering
Watch real-world YouTube reviews from content creators and the Trail Running community.
See the differences between Mizuno Neo Lumina GTX and Puma Fast Trac Nitro 4 in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Answers based on product data and key differences.
Can't find what you're looking for? Ask anything about Mizuno Neo Lumina GTX vs Puma Fast Trac Nitro 4 and our AI will answer.
For value comparison: The Mizuno Neo Lumina GTX ($140) provides premium features compared to the Puma Fast Trac Nitro 4 ($140). Consider your budget and the specific features that matter most for your trail running setup.
Both came out in 2026.
Closest in price, with what each one does better.

Adidas
Better than Mizuno Neo Lumina GTX at:
Asics
Better than Mizuno Neo Lumina GTX at:
Asics
Better than Mizuno Neo Lumina GTX at: