Sign In

Mizuno Neo Lumina GTX vs The North Face Altamesa 300

Mizuno Neo Lumina GTX

Mizuno Neo Lumina GTX

$140
The North Face Altamesa 300

The North Face Altamesa 300

$120

Why is Mizuno Neo Lumina GTX better than The North Face Altamesa 300?

Technical Specifications

Compare features between Mizuno Neo Lumina GTX vs The North Face Altamesa 300

Feature

Mizuno Neo Lumina GTX

The North Face Altamesa 300

140 $
BEST
120 $
Trail Running Shoe
Trail Running Shoe
Light trails and gravel paths
Gravel paths and mountain trails
6 mm
6 mm
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Mizuno Enerzy foam with Smooth Speed Assist for cushioning and efficient stride
Lightweight high-rebound midsole with 25 mm cushioning at heel
W-Grip rubber with X10 high-durability compound
SURFACE CTRL™ rubber with 4 mm grippy lugs
N/A
N/A
N/A
null
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Light trail running, gravel paths, outdoor training on mixed surfaces
Trail and mountain running
More Details
View on MizunoView on The North Face
Mizuno Neo Lumina GTX

Have you used the Mizuno Neo Lumina GTX before?

Help the community by answering

The North Face Altamesa 300

Have you used the The North Face Altamesa 300 before?

Help the community by answering

What does the community think about Mizuno Neo Lumina GTX and The North Face Altamesa 300?

Explore real user reviews and anonymized community insights to understand how these products perform in real-world Trail Runningsetups.

View Community Reviews

Visual Comparison

See the differences between Mizuno Neo Lumina GTX and The North Face Altamesa 300 in a side-by-side slider comparison.

Mizuno Neo Lumina GTX
The North Face Altamesa 300

Comparison Questions

Answers based on product data and key differences.

Looking for alternatives to Mizuno Neo Lumina GTX?

Check out the Top 5 alternatives to Mizuno Neo Lumina GTX

View Alternatives