COOSPO H808S vs Wahoo TICKR FIT

COOSPO H808S

$30

Wahoo TICKR FIT

kr 799

Quick verdict

COOSPO H808S

$30

The better pick if you want:

A higher overall score (68 vs 50)
To spend $49.99 less

Wahoo TICKR FIT

kr 799

The better pick if you want:

No clear advantage on the specs we track.

Spec profile

Each axis ranks against the 14 products in Heart Rate Monitor on the site: the further out, the more it stands out in that spec (lighter, cheaper…).

Center: lowest in the category · Edge: highest

COOSPO H808S· leads in 3

Battery lifeFeaturesAffordability

Wahoo TICKR FIT· leads in none

Tied

Water resistanceLightness

Battery life
300 hTop 39%
30 h
Features
3Top 46%
1
Range
10 m
No data
Water resistance
1 m
1 m
Lightness
46 g
46 g
Affordability
$30Top 4%
$80Top 39%

A spec without data for a product is left out of its shape, so it doesn't count as a low score.

Technical Specifications

Compare features between COOSPO H808S vs Wahoo TICKR FIT

Best value in this comparisonOnly differences (15)

Essentials

$30

kr 799

2020

2018

Overview

Electrical (ECG-based chest strap)

Optical (PPG - photoplethysmography)

ECG heart rate sensor

Optical heart rate sensor

Accurate ECG-based heart rate measurement, Stable signal ideal for high-intensity training, ANT+ and Bluetooth compatibility with multiple devices, Lightweight and comfortable chest strap design, Long battery life with replaceable battery

Optical heart rate and calorie tracking from the forearm, Comfortable alternative to a chest strap, Bluetooth and ANT+ for phones, watches and bike computers, Rechargeable battery that lasts up to 30 hours, Two armband sizes included

Connectivity

ANT+, Bluetooth Low Energy

Bluetooth Low Energy, ANT+

Yes

Up to 10 m (Bluetooth), extended with ANT+

—

Battery

Replaceable (CR2032 coin cell)

Rechargeable (magnetic charging dock)

Up to 300 hours (about 1 hour of training per day)

Up to 30 hours

Build & durability

IP67 (1 m immersion, not suitable for swimming)

IPX7 (1 m immersion, not suitable for swimming)

-10°C to 50°C

—

46 g (sensor + strap)

Approx. 46 g (sensor + armband)

Elastic fabric with conductive electrodes

Adjustable fabric armband

ABS plastic

Plastic

Ready to buy?

Have you used the COOSPO H808S before?

Help the community by answering

Have you used the Wahoo TICKR FIT before?

Help the community by answering

Video Reviews

Watch real-world YouTube reviews from content creators and the Trail Running community.

See all 10 video reviews

COOSPO H808S

Wahoo TICKR FIT

Visual Comparison

See the differences between COOSPO H808S and Wahoo TICKR FIT in a side-by-side slider comparison.

Comparison Questions

Answers based on product data and key differences.

Ask your own question

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask anything about COOSPO H808S vs Wahoo TICKR FIT and our AI will answer.

Try asking:

Frequently Asked Questions

Which offers better value: COOSPO H808S vs Wahoo TICKR FIT?

For value comparison: The COOSPO H808S ($30) offers better affordability compared to the Wahoo TICKR FIT ($79.99). Consider your budget and the specific features that matter most for your trail running setup.