
Joma
Better than Asics Sonoma 8 at:
- A higher overall score (85 vs 75)
- A lighter option (60 g less)

Asics Sonoma 8
$120
The better pick if you want:
The North Face Altamesa 300
€120
The better pick if you want:
Each axis ranks against the 174 products in Shoes on the site: the further out, the more it stands out in that spec (lighter, cheaper…).
Center: lowest in the category · Edge: highest
Asics Sonoma 8· leads in 2
The North Face Altamesa 300· leads in none
Tied
Lightness
Grip
Drophigher isn't better or worse
Affordability
Compare features between Asics Sonoma 8 vs The North Face Altamesa 300
How Asics Sonoma 8 vs The North Face Altamesa 300 should behave on each kind of ground, estimated from lug depth, stack height, weight and outsole rubber. Pick a ground to see what decides it.
| Pick a ground | Average | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53 | |||||||
| 47 |
Cushioning and low weight make the kilometres easier; very deep lugs squirm on hard ground.
Estimated: no data on stack height, assumed average.
Estimated: no data on stack height, assumed average.
A model built from the specs to compare shoes, not a lab measurement.
Help the community by answering

Help the community by answering
Watch real-world YouTube reviews from content creators and the Trail Running community.
See the differences between Asics Sonoma 8 and The North Face Altamesa 300 in a side-by-side slider comparison.
Answers based on product data and key differences.
Can't find what you're looking for? Ask anything about Asics Sonoma 8 vs The North Face Altamesa 300 and our AI will answer.
For value comparison: The Asics Sonoma 8 ($120) provides premium features compared to the The North Face Altamesa 300 ($120). Consider your budget and the specific features that matter most for your trail running setup.
Both came out in 2024.
Closest in price, with what each one does better.
Compare Asics Sonoma 8 or The North Face Altamesa 300 with other top trail running shoes from brands such as Asics, The North Face and more.